Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay explored the key opportunities, challenges, and ongoing responses to AI regulation, with a specific focus on the implications of AI for the law. AI relies on high volumes of data and large-scale computation to make decisions or predictions that would otherwise require human intelligence. The opportunities afforded by AI touch every sector, including law, where it can streamline tedious administrative tasks acting at scale to help prioritize cases, retrieve data, etc. in just seconds. In this context, the European Parliament is looking to prevent the emergence of a Wild West environment and is striving to ensure that AI use is ethical, protects fundamental rights, and respects the rule of law. However, existing laws have proven insufficient in effectively addressing the challenges posed by such technologies. The opportunities AI provides should be maximized whilst ensuring accountability and civil liability when AI systems cause damage. Thus, a two-pronged response is needed; legal frameworks for the regulation of AI systems in the interest of fairness, safety, privacy, anti-discrimination, etc.; and mechanisms to ensure that when AI systems cause damage, adequate civil liability systems are in place to redress victims. The discussion was underpinned by empirical evidence from the literature that outlines and explains the problems posed by AI for the legal sector and the implications of the proposals advanced by the European Parliament. The extent to which empirical evidence goes beyond the legal sector was also examined.